The sections
Summary — overall score, per-skill scores, top strengths and top concerns.
Question by question — every question, the candidate's answer, the score, and the reasoning. The part worth reading when a number surprises you.
Communication — clarity, structure, confidence and vocabulary, scored separately from technical content so a strong engineer who explains poorly is visible as exactly that.
Integrity — what the monitoring observed, if it was enabled.
Transcript and recording — the full record.
Reading the integrity section
Read the evidence, not the trust score. The score is a summary of the evidence, and the evidence is what tells you whether a flag matters.
Most flags are innocent. A face leaving frame is usually somebody stretching. A second voice is usually a household. A tab switch is usually a notification. What is worth attention is a pattern: repeated switches at the same point in every answer, a voice that speaks in turn with the candidate, a face that changes.
An interview with monitoring off shows no integrity section rather than a clean one. Absence of evidence is not evidence of innocence, and the report does not pretend otherwise.
Exporting
Reports export as PDF with the same content. The PDF is generated as text, so it is searchable and can be read by a screen reader.
When a report is not there yet
Generation takes a few minutes after the candidate finishes. The tab says whether it is still generating, has failed, or was never started — three different situations with three different answers, rather than one spinner.